A freshly dog-eared review
Nick Is the Worst Husband in Thriller Fiction Right Now
I read this book in one sitting on my couch with a glass of wine going warm on the side table because I kept forgetting it existed. That’s the whole review, honestly. I could stop there. But I have opinions about the ending, and about Nick, and about how a book can be objectively kind of silly and still absolutely work, so bear with me.
| Author | Jeneva Rose |
| Published | 2020 |
| Genre | Domestic thriller |
| Format | Standalone (later spawned a sequel, “One of Us Is Dead”) |
| Reception | A word-of-mouth and BookTok breakout that readers either devour in a day or roll their eyes at by chapter ten |
| Our rating | 3.5/5 |
| Read it if | you want a fast, trashy, plane-ride thriller and don’t need your twists to survive a second thought |
| Skip it if | you need literary prose or a mystery that holds up under interrogation |
A Husband, a Body, and a Marriage That Was Never Perfect
Here’s the setup. Sarah is a defense attorney, married to Nick, a guy who is charming in the way that always makes me suspicious of fictional husbands named Nick (thank you, Gone Girl, for ruining that name forever). Nick is having an affair with his assistant, Kelly. Kelly turns up dead. Nick is the obvious suspect. And Sarah, who is very good at her job and very much still married to this man, ends up representing him.
That’s the hook, and it’s a good one. A wife defending the husband she knows is probably guilty, in a courtroom, while their marriage rots from the inside, is a premise with real teeth. Rose alternates perspectives between Sarah and Nick, which is the smartest structural choice in the book, because it lets you sit inside Nick’s smugness and Sarah’s slow-building fury at the same time. You know things Sarah doesn’t. You’re waiting for her to catch up. That gap is where the tension lives, and for the first half, it works.
I won’t spoil what Sarah does about it, but I’ll say this: the back half of the book stops being a courtroom drama and turns into something closer to a revenge thriller, and your enjoyment of the whole book depends heavily on how much you’re willing to go with that pivot.
Fast, Mean, and a Little Bit Dumb (I Mean That Fondly)
Look, the prose here is not going to win anyone a Pulitzer. It’s plain, functional, sometimes clunky. Rose is not interested in a beautiful sentence. She’s interested in you turning the page, and on that metric she absolutely delivers. I read the entire second half in about ninety minutes because I physically could not put my phone (my Kindle app, let’s be honest) down.
What genuinely works: Nick. He is such a specific, punchable kind of narcissist. Not a cartoon villain, just a garden-variety guy who has convinced himself he’s the victim of every situation he personally created. His internal chapters are the best writing in the book because Rose nails that particular male self-mythology, the guy who cheats and somehow frames himself as long-suffering. I found myself getting genuinely angry at a fictional man, which, fine, means the character is working.
What doesn’t work, and I’ll die on this hill: the plotting gets sloppy once the twists start stacking. There’s a reveal involving Sarah that a lot of readers saw coming from a mile off, and once it lands, some of the earlier chapters stop making logical sense if you think about them for more than five seconds. I don’t need every thriller to be airtight, but this one asks you to buy some coincidences and some legal maneuvering that would get a real attorney disbarred, and it asks you to buy it fast, without blinking. I blinked. More than once I said “wait, that’s not how any of this works” out loud to my empty apartment.
And here’s where I question my own taste a little: I know this book is not that good, structurally, and I still had a great time reading it. Is that a failure of the book or a failure of me wanting a trashy page-turner on a Tuesday night? Probably both. Sometimes you don’t want Tana French. Sometimes you want a book that moves like a soap opera and doesn’t apologize for it.
The ending is the most divisive part, and I get why. It’s a little too neat, a little too cold, and it leans hard into “satisfying” over “believable.” I didn’t hate it. I did raise an eyebrow.
If you want to grab a copy, here’s the Amazon listing, and honestly, the paperback is the right format for this one. Beach bag, not bookshelf.
Every marriage is a courtroom eventually. This one just happens to have an actual jury.
About Jeneva Rose
Jeneva Rose is a Chicago-based author who writes the kind of thrillers you finish in a weekend and immediately hand to your sister with a warning. She built a real following through TikTok and Instagram before “The Perfect Marriage” broke out, which tracks, because her books have that same instinct for hook and pacing that goes viral: short chapters, mean twists, characters you love to hate. She’s since written a sequel and several other thrillers, and she’s clearly not trying to be your next favorite literary novelist. She’s trying to keep you up past midnight. Mission accomplished, most of the time.
If This Wrecked Your Marriage Trust Issues, Read These Next
Some books to pair with the specific flavor of “is my spouse a monster” dread this one leaves behind.
- Gone Girl by Gillian Flynn, the original blueprint for marriage-as-crime-scene, and still the sharper, meaner version of this idea.
- The Silent Patient by Alex Michaelides, for another twist-heavy thriller that leans on a courtroom-adjacent psychological unraveling.
- Behind Closed Doors by B.A. Paris, for the domestic horror of a marriage that looks perfect from the outside and isn’t.
- One of Us Is Dead by Jeneva Rose, if you want more of Rose’s exact brand of trashy-fun twist stacking.
For your book club
- Could you defend a partner in court if you genuinely believed they were guilty? Where’s your line?
- Did you see the big twist coming, and if so, at what point?
- Is Nick a believable villain, or a caricature of a certain kind of man? Does it matter which?
- Does the ending feel earned, or does it prioritize a satisfying gut-punch over logic?
- What does the book seem to be saying about marriage as a performance versus marriage as a partnership?
Want another one that’ll ruin your sleep schedule
Check out more of our book reviews for the next thing to bring on your flight or your next messy book club pick.